{"id":9215,"date":"2026-04-21T05:50:21","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T10:50:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/westplexnews.com\/index.php\/2026\/04\/21\/bill-requiring-sex-based-restrooms-dorms-clears-missouri-house\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T05:50:21","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T10:50:21","slug":"bill-requiring-sex-based-restrooms-dorms-clears-missouri-house","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/westplexnews.com\/index.php\/2026\/04\/21\/bill-requiring-sex-based-restrooms-dorms-clears-missouri-house\/","title":{"rendered":"Bill requiring sex-based restrooms, dorms clears Missouri House"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"
\n

State Rep. Becky Laubinger, a Republican from Park Hills speaks on the Missouri House floor Feb. 3, 2026 (Tim Bommel\/House Communications).<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Missouri House passed a <\/span>bill<\/span><\/a> Monday that would force entities receiving state funding to restrict usage of restrooms, changing areas and sleeping accommodations based on biological sex and codify definitions for \u201cfemale,\u201d \u201cmale\u201d and \u201csex\u201d throughout state statute.<\/span><\/p>\n

State Rep. Becky Laubinger, a Republican from Park Hills, pitched the legislation as a \u201cvital protection for women.\u201d Lax policies and all-gender restrooms, like facilities in the Kansas City International Airport, invite predators, she argued.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis is about our government facilities forcing people to share those spaces by creating all gender spaces where you don\u2019t have the option in those spaces to go to a single sex space,\u201d Laubinger said.<\/span><\/p>\n

But during a House debate over the bill\u2019s language last week, Democrats raised numerous issues with the legislation, saying it would be used to target transgender people.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIf you can just call the police and accuse someone of using the wrong bathroom, think about the implications of that,\u201d said state Rep. Wick Thomas, a Kansas City Democrat and the House\u2019s first transgender member.<\/span><\/p>\n

The bill lacks an enforcement mechanism, other than allowing people to sue state-funded entities that do not \u201ctake reasonable steps\u201d to designate single-sex spaces.<\/span><\/p>\n

The bill\u2019s <\/span>fiscal note<\/span><\/a> reflects concerns about costly litigation, though state departments could not estimate how much they will be impacted.<\/span><\/p>\n

The University of Central Missouri projected \u201can indeterminate fiscal impact,\u201d pointing to the \u201ccosts associated with enforcement of the regulations.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The bill would require public universities to restrict dorm rooms, bathrooms and locker rooms based on biological sex. It states that, \u201cno individual shall enter a restroom, changing room or sleeping quarters that is designated for females or males unless he or she is a member of that sex.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

State Rep. Keri Ingle, a Democrat from Lee\u2019s Summit, asked if this would bar college students from having students of the opposite sex in their dorm rooms overnight.<\/span><\/p>\n

Laubinger said she had heard complaints from college students who felt uncomfortable when their roommate allowed a significant other to sleep over.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI understand someone not wanting a boy over,\u201d Ingle said. \u201cI don\u2019t know why we would legislate that. I don\u2019t know why we would put that in the statute.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

State Rep. Mark Boyko, a Democrat from Kirkwood, said the bill would bar men from visiting women\u2019s dorm rooms at any time. He wouldn\u2019t be allowed to help his daughter set up her dorm room as a man, he said.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI understand the intention you\u2019re having,\u201d he told Laubinger. \u201cBut the words don\u2019t match your intention of this bill.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

House Republicans offered broad support, calling the bill a basic safety measure.<\/span><\/p>\n

State Rep. Carolyn Caton, a Blue Springs Republican, said she thinks the legislation would be a \u201cgood protection.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIf nothing else, I think it just eases some young ladies\u2019 minds,\u201d she said.<\/span><\/p>\n

The bill passed along party lines Monday, apart from a lone Republican \u201cnay\u201d from state Rep. Tara Peters of Rolla, who also voted against the bill at the committee level.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n <\/i>\n

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n